Bug#686447: Review of debian/copyright for zfs-linux
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
<andreas.cadhalpun@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, it's fine to have them separated, but in that case shouldn't the
> copyright of the default stanza match what the COPYRIGHT file says, or maybe
> just add Sun Microsystems, Inc. to the default stanza?
Yes.
> As you are the author of the man page in question here, do you agree to
> license the file man/man1/splat.1 under a DFSG-free license, e.g. GPL-2+?
Yes, of course, according to the mainline project license.
> I haven't reviewed the debian/copyright of zfs-linux fully yet, but attached
> patch fixes some issues I already noticed:
Thanks, syntax changes will happen on your advice.
Reply to: