[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#650394: updated packages available

On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
> now the package has an ITP again, without many action. I did update the
> packaging, and built it here:

> https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+sourcepub/4325100/+listing-archive-extra

> "final" package currently in
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/utopic/+queue?queue_state=0

> if accepted, it will be available from
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tigervnc

ha -- great -- thanks for the update, I only wished that the
debian/changelog entry was a bit more descriptive ;)  

- I guess since packaging now doesn't carry a copy of xorg sources,
  there is no need to keep +X1.15.0 in the version (especially since it
  is actually 1.16.0 both in jessie/sid and 1.15.1 in trusty/utopic

- debian/rules has 

  include /usr/share/xserver-xorg/configure_flags.mk

  now -- but where that file supposed to come from? can't locate it...
  my quick discussions on IRC I believe didn't finalize in shipping that
  one along within xorg-server-source

- would you be interested to join tigervnc-devel team and just commit
  your changes to our Git?

- I see that there is some packaging available in upstream sources now,
  done by Brian (CCed).  Brian -- would you be interested to join our
  tigervnc Debian packaging team to not duplicate efforts and avoid
  proliferation of tigervnc debian package names?
  See https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-tigervnc/
  all packaging is under Git and I am looking at changes from Matthias

We might still be in time for jessie -- we might be just a tiny push
away! ;)

Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Research Scientist,            Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

Reply to: