Bug#702773: libcidr: changing back from ITP to RFP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Long time ago I expressed interest in packaging libcidr. Long time ago I
actually made the package.
Long time ago I uploaded it to the mentors server. Long time ago I tried
to get any feedback about it,
but everyone ignored it. Long time ago it got deleted from the mentors
server as expired.
l'm just as frustrated with debian development process as long time ago
now. ;)
On 07/28/2014 08:47 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> retitle 702773 RFP: libcidr -- IPv4 and IPv6 address manipulation library
> noowner 702773
> tag 702773 - pending
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libcidr.
Unfortunately,
> it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP
bugs open
> for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
> refrain from packaging the software.
>
> This is an automatic email to change the status of libcidr back from ITP
> (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug
hasn't seen
> any activity during the last 12 months.
>
> If you are still interested in packaging libcidr, please send a mail to
> <control@bugs.debian.org> with:
>
> retitle 702773 ITP: libcidr -- IPv4 and IPv6 address manipulation library
> owner 702773 !
> thanks
>
> It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
> time, by mailing <702773@bugs.debian.org>. If you need guidance on how to
> package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org mailing list.
>
> Thank you for your interest in Debian,
- --
#!/usr/bin/env perl
@a=split(//, "daniil @ baturin . org" );# Daniil Baturin
@b=split(//,q/Px%!+o0Q6lh*7dp$.@8#%|y{/);while($i<24){$_.=
chr((ord(@b[$i])-ord(@a[$i])+62)%94+32);$i++};print"$_\n"#
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT1mLpAAoJEEcm35UR4K8fqVEQAI8tFTjY/tbekTiRZ8WgsGz+
LZstWYJRG8YZdq+CGKpqd+IfetZKfXFdrDwgTnBqp83QutHbXMn8IVkrbBnU7stI
VFyaF6iP2yHNFuuW6rvbxZ71qMInKMs7y9itIalkj5Edv7eD+vmZQvyjJ6zhLj3X
u5fABk4Y/IiBJZDa8HTorojT/b4XpMrnvaQsNjTMGzxaoCoho+dlQBEFhnGAoQbk
c7SffYSG0tO/qmOlRm5NhKK+ZdPCfZ1PkgTuGn3fNa3IbwYNeZcgp4UpzauJD3uq
pp+aWkYv2zrupv2zg2ylIt095/MbHm9S83tP/pgQlNiBq42NvYyjgf8vJWUVSUhx
iXsUvIblaKTJOanzJMg9+/sgpn1ifee5H2AIhU6LyD7gd2tdayxxMOwKCRYrkNYr
LgytRzksDhr8KzRqLw0vGRimYvC4yGcNP1+h2EtRyvamCu5bXNlquhPVq2q0syLm
njsxHjUk+vje2lcBc5Xr8oFYECZkn6l8WmfUn05TnPKfuRg7hN7Z7c4qx8TGyOfZ
kGRsNrGmGH3EO5VJMw6QgtacVfvmSGTg4q78UG7Px4AvNQ47tGWADVuNUCsxNrS1
WRxt8+gf3ONwWIgRwEuE5bvwwFbt7QVf5IXDUFd/YnW6v50gcHioaj0/ukIBZYIS
FvcKCh7ofveNfECz5kj0
=TPYb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: