Bug#754910: cgmanager_0.20-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 07/17/2014 02:39 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> My experience with upstream trying to do Debian packaging isn't great.
>> Often, they only care about a single package, know it's upstream source,
>> but don't perform well on the packaging side. I don't think what you've
>> wrote above is a good point of argumentation.
>
> Uh, thanks.
This wasn't directed to you personally at all, so please don't take it
for you! I have no idea how you do on packaging. It was just comments
about Dimitri John Ledkov point of argumentation.
By the way, Daniel doing the packaging, and you doing peer-review on it
because you need it for Ubuntu, and you care for it, is probably the
best outcome for this particular package. 2 pairs of eyes is always
better than a single one.
> Anyway, I'll be posting a new 0.28 release later today, based upon which
> Daniel will post a new package, with himself listed as maintainer. We'll
> proceed from there.
Great, I'm happy it got solved the positive way!
On 07/17/2014 02:41 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Lesson learned?
Definitively yes! I don't want this to happen again.
Thomas
Reply to: