Bug#617296: Any Progress with RStudio?
On 14 May 2014 at 17:08, Rogério Brito wrote:
| Is there anybody that wants to get rstudio packaged, even if in a "dirty"
| state, while other dependencies are not yet in Debian?
| I just started looking at the source and it seems to mostly compile with
| what we have in Debian, but I don't know (yet) how to convince the build
| system to use the local hunspell or the local mathjax.
| Anyway, I can push the *super* embrionary packaging that I have so far. I
| would like some help with the maintainance of this package since I have
| barely any time left with the amount of packages that I maintain.
I am semi-regularly IM'ing or emailing with the RStudio founder whom I'll
meet tomorrow. I also have pretty good contacts with a number of other
RStudio developers and engineers.
You want to look at the current dev packages, eg (in binary)
which, inter alia, contain a very cooked-up local build of pandoc to be able
to get the very, very latest pandoc binary without any depends.
I am not sure how ready this is even for Debian unstable, and they _do_
provide ready-made .deb packages that users like myself deploy.
I can ask tomorrow, but RStudio is still a pretty fast moving target.
Dirk Eddelbuettel | email@example.com | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com