Bug#743876: non-c99
On 28.04.2014 08:50, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Julian, sorry for not noticing this mail before.
>
> The honest answer is: I was able to package llvmmath because it builds
> (almost) fine by following the usual procedure, not because I understand
> how anything works (and that's clearly part of the reason why I don't
> really intend to adopt this package).
>
> I may find the time to dig into the code following your suggestion...
> but this is not really high priority in my TODO list, mainly because I
> would have to learn a lot first, and my usage of numba is quite
> sporadic.
>
> Pietro
>
>
Hi,
I have forwarded the issue to upstream
https://github.com/ContinuumIO/llvmmath/issues/10
Reply to: