[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#743020: ITP: adventure -- Colossal Cave adventure game



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

hi,



On 2014-03-30 05:51, Ben Finney wrote:
> Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Finney
> <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
> 
> * Package name    : adventure

that seems a *very* generic name for a source package.
i'd suggest to use a more unique name, like "colossal-cave-adventure"-

> Version         : 1.3 Upstream Author : Brandon Rhodes
> <brandon@rhodesmill.org> * URL             :
> http://www.example.org/

hmm, this link does not seem to point anywhere valid.
please fill in the template completely :-)

> The code will produce the following packages:
> 
> * colossal-cave-adventure: Colossal Cave Adventure game *
> adventure: (alias for ‘colossal-cave-adventure’, via “Provides”)

so you won't create a binary package "adventure", but rather have
"colossal-cave-adventure" provide "adventure"?
i don't see a compelling reason to do so, as "Provides" really makes
most sense if there are *multiple* packages providing (more or less)
the same functionality.
if you don't expect other providers of "adventure", then it's probably
an overkill to use "Provides".
if you are worrying about people finding the package easily enough,
you should consider using "debtags" [1] instead of multiple package names.

fgmasdr
IOhannes


[1] http://debtags.debian.net/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=63yO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: