Hi, On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 08:27:54PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Yes, but the bad news is that I've never even seen any Haskell code > > before, so some help related to packaging of that is very welcome. > > glad to hear that. > > It seems that implict also provides a Haskell API, to be used > programmatically. This means that it will be involved in the Haskell ABI > system and therefore should probably be maintained along the other > Haskell packages. > > So I suggest it should be co-maintained by the DHG together with you: We > make sure that it builds and that it is rebuilt when its dependencies > change etc.; you are responsible for all the other maintenance duties > (replying to bug reports, curating package description and manpages, > letting us know if a new version should be uploaded etc.). How does that > sound? Yes, that sounds good. > BTW, are you sure this is a healthy project? Last release was in January > 2013, last commit 10 years ago, recent bug reports are not replied to. > These are typical signs of an abandoned project... Yes, I noticed this as well. I'll check to see if I can get contact with upstream. Normally I would take over if they don't respond, but given that I don't know the language, I don't think that's a good idea in this case. Thanks, Bas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature