On 28/02/14 10:30, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > I'm basically Ccing half the world in this (only half sorry about that :) and I don't know who half > of you are :), but there have been very little information on what's happening with ZoL in Debian > GNU/Linux. > > Aron (and in some part Carlos) seems to have gone a-wall and the list have been VERY quiet. It seems > like it's only Aron and me that is actually Debian GNU/Linux Developers (unless other things have > happened outside the list that I'm not aware of - Carlos was/is a maintainer if I don't > misremembering and Darik is in the wait queue?). And no actually status information/reason from the > FTP maintainers about why it have been stuck in incoming for so long (accepted into incoming Sun, 07 > Jul 2013 16:00:06 - that's more than six months ago!). Have it been rejected? Is it held up for some > reason? What can I/we do to help move it along? > > > I'm now the current Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy package maintainer (and have been for quite some time) > for/in ZoL ("upstream" from Debian GNU/Linux I suppose) and I have contributed to both the packaging > (that is already in the Alioth repos) as well as bits and pieces to ZoL code (such as SMB and iSCSI > support - which will be accepted into post-0.6.3 which is due out "very soon now" we hope) and also > wrote support for ZoL to be used as installation target (debian installer, part-man) etc. > > With that - I have a large vested interest in maintaining this and I work on it almost daily, so if > no one else have the time (Aron, Carlos).... > > I know that Darik is also very busy working on this, and he already maintain (and have for a very > long time) the Ubuntu packages in ZoL, and much (most, all?) of the current packaging is from his > busy hands. > > So I'd prefer to work with him on this (if aron/carlos don't have the time/interest that is - I'm not > proposing to steal the packaging!). > > > Since there have been next to no progress in the Debian GNU/Linux ZoL projects, I have done all my > packaging stuff in the ZoL repos, so if/when this project is revitalized, I'll push all my work to > the Debian GNU/Linux repos as individual commits. > Hi, We are still waiting for ftp-masters. I already poked them yesterday and this was their answer: Thu Feb 26 #debian-ftp on OFTC [13:20] <clopez> anyone from the ftp team can quickly and gently tell me about the status of the package zfs-linux on NEW? It has been sitting there for 6 months already [14:28] <paultag> clopez: no one has had time to properly ensure the CDDL / GPL linking mess is above the table [14:29] <paultag> k [14:29] <paultag> whoops [14:29] <clopez> paultag: there is no CCDL / GPL linking: the package only ships the kernel module in source format, the kernel module binaries are built at install time with dkms [14:29] <paultag> I understand that's the line [14:30] <paultag> but the fact is it's transitively linking is something we have to look at [14:30] <paultag> I know when the website copy says about it [14:30] <clopez> sorry, what means transitively linking? [14:31] <paultag> I need to leave for work, just because you link to a shim which links to something doesn't mean it's not all linked together. [14:32] <clopez> paultag: I understand, but the package don't ships kernel binaries, only source code. So as long as binaries are not distributed (and the package don't distributes them) I think there is no problem [14:32] <paultag> I understand what the website says [14:33] <paultag> but you'll not be suprised when we take our time figuring out what the hell is going on with this one. [14:34] <clopez> yes, I understand you need your time, only wanted to have an update regarding this because I felt it was somehow forgotten [14:34] <clopez> thanks for the update [14:34] <paultag> it's not forgotten, we just haven't had a slice of time to commune about it [14:34] <paultag> feel free to email ftpmaster@ and poke [14:37] <clopez> Liang Guo did that some weeks ago but he got not reply (AFAIK) So, I don't know how more we can do other than wait. Regards!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature