Bug#740135: ITP: slt -- TLS reverse-proxy with SNI multiplexing (TLS virtual hosts)

[Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm@users.sourceforge.net>]

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:17:53 -0500
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:

[...]
>  slt lets a user can send TLS/SSL connections for multiple different

I'd rephrase it as "lets the user direct TLS/SSL connections..."

>  applications to the same port and the server can forward them all to
>  the appropriate backend hosts depending on the intended destination.
>  .
>  slt is capable of either terminating the TLS and passing the
>  cleartext traffic to the origin server (if it has appropriate key
>  material), or just passing the through the traffic directly (if it
>  has no key material).

I'd rephrase it as well: "..., or just passing the traffic through (if
it has...".

I'm not the native speaker so please be warned; but these two phrases
catched my eye.  Both are obviously incorrect ("lets a user can send"
and "passing the through the") but I'd also change them slightly so
that they read better, as showed.