On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >No, it means I don't have the time, nor nerve to discuss this. We're > >after all busy to keep Debian secure and sick of maintainers who only > >focus on their pet package and neglegt the overall maintainability > >of the Debian archive. > > While I always stated that I'm open to discussion, you just ended > the discussion after trying to block FFmpeg from entering Debian, > which I do not find very constructive. My feeling is that this was discussed over and over and Moritz is /slighly/ tired of repeating the same thing over and over. And me replying to this mail doesn't mean I'm willing to engage in a large thread on this, the security team position has been given. > > I want to see FFmpeg in Debian and I'm interested in any > constructive discussion about problems that might bring for others. > If you don't have time for such a discussion that is a pity. Well, as it was already sated, the discussion needs to happen with libav maintainers (and reverse dependencies indeed). -- Yves-Alexis Perez Debian security team
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature