Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:39:04 -0800 with message-id <20140211193904.GX24404@rzlab.ucr.edu> and subject line [CTTE #727708] Default init system for Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #718267, regarding ITP: xidle -- run a program on X inactivity to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 718267: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ITP: xidle -- run a program on X inactivity
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:43:02 +0200
- Message-id: <20130729134302.8087.49015.reportbug@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de>
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> * Package name : xidle Version : CVS HEAD Upstream Author : Federico G. Schwindt <fgsch@cvs.openbsd.org> * URL : https://www.mirbsd.org/man1/xidle * License : 2-clause UCB Programming Lang: C Description : run a program on X inactivity xidle uses the XScreenSaver(3) extension to receive inactivity events when a timeout is specified, running a specific program after the elapsed time. xidle also monitors the very corner of the given position for pointer activity and runs a program if the pointer sits there for more than the specified number of seconds. This behavior is always present, whether -timeout is specified or not. For example, I’ve got this in my ~/.xinitrc for use with evilwm: # run xlock on moving to the upper-right corner xidle -ne -program '/usr/bin/xlock -mode life' &
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
- Subject: [CTTE #727708] Default init system for Debian
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:39:04 -0800
- Message-id: <20140211193904.GX24404@rzlab.ucr.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
The technical committee was asked in #727708 to decide which init system would be the default init system for Debian. The decision is below: ==== RESOLUTION ==== We exercise our power to decide in cases of overlapping jurisdiction (6.1.2) by asserting that the default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should be systemd. Should the project pass a General Resolution before the release of "jessie" asserting a "position statement about issues of the day" on init systems, that position replaces the outcome of this vote and is adopted by the Technical Committee as its own decision. ==== END OF RESOLUTION ==== Additional discussions regarding the technical policy necessary for implementing this decision are anticipated and will be carried out via the normal technical policy procedure. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/727708 for discussion of this bug. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com If I had a letter, sealed it in a locked vault and hid the vault somewhere in New York. Then told you to read the letter, thats not security, thats obscurity. If I made a letter, sealed it in a vault, gave you the blueprints of the vault, the combinations of 1000 other vaults, access to the best lock smiths in the world, then told you to read the letter, and you still can't, thats security. -- Bruce SchneierAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---