[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#487388: [pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#714260: Helping with flightgear package



On 07/31/2013 05:24 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> I've pushed upstream/2.10.0 and an update to the debian packaging of it.
> It's based It's based on your changes. I hope that's okay.
> 
> Obviously, it's not of much use without an updated simgear package,
> which flightgear depends on. I have updates for that ready as well, but
> am not sure where to push to.

Just as a heads up: all three are now available on collab-maint and are
updated to work together to provide FlightGear 2.10:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/simgear.git
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/flightgear-data.git
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/flightgear.git

I'm still working on it, but it's worth pointing out a few design
decisions that may be controversial:

 - I moved the scenery data package back into the base one, as it's
   too small to matter (< 10 MiB) and didn't disturb terrasync, either.
 - Split AI data into its own package (ca. 130 MiB)
 - Consistently renamed fgfs to flightgear (package names)
 - Renamed simgear to libsimgear, split to match SONAMES

I'd still like to:

 - Use debhelper 7 for simgear as well. And get rid of the static
   variant of that library in libsimgear-dev. It would simplify rules a
   lot. Anybody opposed to that?

I envision flightgear-data-base to be a package that's sufficient to run
flightgear on. No AI, no object models, only the default c172 aircraft.

(Of course, that currently emits lots of warnings and load errors. I
hope to be able to get rid of those eventually.)

Regards

Markus Wanner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: