Bug#713005: RFA: miredo -- Teredo IPv6 tunneling through NATs
(continued...)
so I've looked at your git repos and I'm a bit confused
about their interdependence.
I've marked these commits as relevant to debian packaging:
4ccbcafb232d95b4a9802b9d4cff7b8bfddd96a0 - cdbs bug (not relevant as I switched to debhelper)
a30b1c2e4258536c940bbba8349ae4c00643fd48 - SVN banner
d2898815671e43e63f6b828e48107d4d471c4e20 - miredo.ifup fix
57082262d06bfeacb11275d366028f225c124d9b - ifup comestics
e4c669b4f6fa588e62b571a2492723d67207dabb - systemd
976fb87c98790f201c067a8810dd3e1f9dcd4b97 - status init.d
b5389e5eede40d309e389d6c9a350aa7125c31b7 - linux-any, kfreebsd-any
the rest is upstream if I get it correctly and so is packaged here:
http://www.remlab.net/files/miredo/?C=N;O=D
Am I right?
Tomasz
On 02/07/13 00:37, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've converted 1.2.3 version to debhelper as a first step, see:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/miredo.git;a=summary
>
> From what I see, it is 100% compatible with the previous package.
> I would like to upload it to experimental to see if it builds everywhere.
> (actually I've *uploaded* it already just few seconds ago, forgetting
> that I don't have rights for that!).
>
> Can you see if it didn't break?
> I will backport other changes and pull newer upstream versions later.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomasz
>
> On 30/06/13 19:18, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > Le samedi 29 juin 2013 02:28:22, Tomasz Buchert a écrit :
> > > * why do you compile miredo statically? shouldn't you compile
> > > dynamically and provide libmiredo or something?
> >
> > Nothing else uses it, so it was overkill.
> >
> > > * I noticed that the test suite sometimes fails (rarely and randomly);
> > > the test name is libteredo-list; was testing a part of a cdbs build
> > > before?
> >
> > I removed the test cases way back then because some buildwes were either too
> > slow or too low on memory to run them.
> >
> > --
> > Rémi Denis-Courmont
> > http://www.remlab.net/
Reply to: