[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#663021: marked as done (ITP: bridj -- Java / native interoperability library)

Your message dated Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:57:33 -0500
with message-id <CAPM41nMTCe8iKC9e7XXv=UBp++VLb4bbxNapSo5GdbO7YKdtjg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing ITPs related to BridJ packaging
has caused the Debian Bug report #663021,
regarding ITP: bridj -- Java / native interoperability library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : bridj
  Version         : 0.6
  Upstream Author : Olivier Chafik
* URL             : http://code.google.com/p/bridj/
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: C, C++, Objective C, C#, Java
  Description     : Java / native interoperability library

BridJ is an interoperability library used in making native calls to C, C++, and
COM libraries. BridJ was written from scratch to replace JNA, with performance
and usability as golden objectives.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- I tried using BridJ for a small project I was working on. I found that jnaerator is not close to being ready for production use. I could not get jnaerator to parse even a simple C++ header and output appropriate Java classes. I have since switched to using SWIG.

I left the packaging work I was doing up on git.debian.org. If anyone wants to try packaging bridj and friends anyway, feel free to reopen the appropriate ITPs or file new ones.

--
Andres


--
~ Andres

--- End Message ---
Reply to: