Bug#732727: RFP: scrz -- supervisor to run many isolated linux containers on a host system
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
* Package name : scrz
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Tomas Carnecky <tomas.carnecky@gmail.com>
* URL : http://scrz.io , https://github.com/scrz/scrz
* License : MIT like: http://unlicense.org
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : supervisor to run many isolated linux containers on a host system
scrz manages linux containers (configure, start, stop, supervize) and the
images that should be run in those containers. It's inspired by docker.io but
written in Haskell and uses btrfs instead of aufs for image and snapshot
management.
Hi Debian-Haskell folks,
I hope that somebody might be interested in this cool project. I've no
experience with Haskell and would be curious how much work it might be to
package this cool and promising project for Debian?
Regards, Thomas Koch
CC'ed upstream.
More infos on scrz:
- - https://blog.caurea.org/2013/02/03/scrz-deployment-tool.html
- - https://blog.caurea.org/2013/04/04/docker-like-tool-written-in-haskell.html
- - https://blog.caurea.org/2013/07/20/scrz-features-which-docker-doesn-t-have.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=UemP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: