Bug#702300: ITA: rdflib
Hi.
chrysn <chrysn@fsfe.org> writes:
> hello oliver,
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:12:18PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
>> What's the current status on your side ?
>
> i have not yet updated my packaging efforts since what is described in
> [1] (in february).
>
OK, so I'll have a deeper look.
>> Maybe we could envision some collaborative maintenance under the
>> umbrella of the Python Modules team
>> (https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam) ?
>
> what kept me from joining that team so far is that they use svn
> exclusively; i can use svn, but prefer git packaging unless there is
> compelling reason to do otherwise.
>
I see.
For me, the VCS is not so much of a big deal, as I more or less either
use git-buildpackage or svn-buildpackage when need be... but I do prefer
git if there's a choice to make, too ;-)
Still, I think the main issue is the manpower, and fulfilling different
needs, like yours of Python 3 and mine of Python 2, etc. So that's why I
think collaborative maintenance is something we should seek... but
that said, I'm a newcomer to the Python modules team (just arrived
yesterday ;) so I don't know exactly all the habits there.
> if you want to join in and want to do something before i get to continue
> working on it (which i assume will be in the second half of december), i
> suggest you start from [1]. when i continue, i'll probably create a repo
> on collab-maint then (unless python-modules starts using git by then).
> if it is critical for you to have the package in python-modules' svn in
> order to join the packaging, and want to go ahead with doing stuff, i
> could do with that too.
>
I'll start with git and we shall see what happens, maybe getting more
knwoledge of what's cooking re Python modules team and git.
I'll let you know soon of my progress.
Best regards,
--
Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> - OpenPGP: 5819D7E8
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF - T&MSP (http://www.it-sudparis.eu)
Reply to: