On 09/14/2013 04:24 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > why does it need to be a new package when there is > libjs-twitter-bootstrap? Because it's not backward compatible, so for a while we'll need both versions available in the archives. > http://packages.debian.org/sid/libjs-twitter-bootstrap > > Taking over this package from the QA group sounds like a good idea to > me. There is a bug report about new upstream release in March (704028) and seems to be stuck. So I don't think that is the best idea to leave the package under QA team umbrella. They have a lot of work, so I think it'd be great if someone else can take over it. Cheers, -- TiN
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature