On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 12:52 +0100, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2013 00:32, "Wolodja Wentland" <debian@babilen5.org> wrote:
>> It is not, but thank you for catching this and reviewing WNPP bugs! :)
>> libjackson-json-java is version 1.* of the JSON processoe by FasterXML
>> while I plan to package version 2.* which has been split into a number of
>> packages and should be packaged separately. In the light of this I will try
>> to make it more obvious that this is, in fact, Jackson2.
> Thanks for packaging the latest version. I think it would be better to be
> consistent on the naming according to the Debian Java standards [1] and name it
> something like libjackson2-core-java.
> [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x114.html
I am not sure if it makes sense to adapt this naming scheme for source
packages and I would personally very much prefer to use the name used by
upstream. There are also quite a number of packages maintained by pkg-java
that simply use the name used by upstream.
The binary packages will, naturally, follow the naming conventions of pkg-java
and this particular source package builds two binary packages, namely:
* libjackson2-core-java
* libjackson2-core-java-doc
Please let me know if that is in line with your expectations and have a nice
day!
--
Wolodja <debian@babilen5.org>
4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature