[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714173: ITP: php-symfony-process -- Symfony PHP Framework - Process component



On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:09:13AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/29/2013 08:30 AM, andrea rota wrote:
> > these three php-symfony-* packages i'm working on are dependencies for
> > Composer, alongside two other PHP libraries which are only distributed
> > via composer itself (not via any PEAR channels), whereas the Symfony
> > components are distributed via both methods.
> > 
> > i started packaging these Symfony components with the dh_phpcomposer
> > helper as suggested previously on the pkg-php-pear list, but i see there
> > are different opinions.
> 
> My understanding of it isn't that there was 2 opinions, but that you
> didn't know about pear.symfony.com. I didn't really follow the
> dh_phpcomposer discussions, I'm sorry if that wasted some of your time.
> 
> > i can re-package the Symfony components from pear.symfony.com if that is
> > the preferred method, of course.
> 
> Yeah, please do!

here is a first attempt:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php-symfony2-process.git

[...]

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:24:37AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 05:20 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> >> Another thing: I have noticed that what is used as upstream source is
> >> > quite wrong for all packages. They should all be coming from
> >> > http://pear.symfony.com/. In there, you will find packages the way they
> >> > should: including a package.xml, so that we can use the PEAR things to
> >> > get them installed, have a registry file, manage dependencies
> >> > automatically, etc. Missing the package.xml is simply wrong, IMO.
> > Again, those are not PEAR pkg.
> 
> I think there's a miss-understanding here. I'm saying that we should use
> what's in pear.symfony.com as it seems to be the same thing (and it
> seems to be the same version), but in a PEAR package format. Am I wrong?
> 
> (I'm taking about php-symfony-process, I haven't looked at other
> packages yet)

pear.symfony.com seems complete to me, providing latest versions of all
the Symfony2 components also available via upstream git.

i have used the existing naming scheme for this Debian package
(php-symfony2-<component), however this will clash with substvars
generated (for libraries from other sources only distributed via
composer) by dh_phpcomposer: in composer/packagist, these same Symfony2
packages are labelled (by the Symfony project) as 'symfony/<component>'
(e.g. symfony/process), which is correctly translated to
php-symfony-process by dh_phpcomposer.

I originally suggested using Provides: but Mathieu pointed out that
Provides is not versioned (and i can see this being an issue with some
fast-changing packages) - Mathieu suggested considering metapackages as
well, which should indeed work here. However, when i tried adding a
second binary package to debian/control for php-symfony2-process,
building failed:

-----
dh clean --buildsystem=phppear --with phppear
   dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=phppear
   dh_clean -O--buildsystem=phppear
gbp:info: php-symfony2-process_2.3.1.orig.tar.gz does not exist, creating from 'upstream/v2.3.1'
gbp:info: Exporting 'HEAD' to '/home/e402b82b49d23e6d2c7ff5f4ede872ab400fee6d/debian.org/packages/pkg-php/php-symfony2-process/build-area/php-symfony2-process-tmp'
gbp:info: Moving '/home/e402b82b49d23e6d2c7ff5f4ede872ab400fee6d/debian.org/packages/pkg-php/php-symfony2-process/build-area/php-symfony2-process-tmp' to '/home/e402b82b49d23e6d2c7ff5f4ede872ab400fee6d/debian.org/packages/pkg-php/php-symfony2-process/build-area/php-symfony2-proces$
-2.3.1'
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I
dpkg-buildpackage: source package php-symfony2-process
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.3.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by andrea rota <a@xelera.eu>
 dpkg-source -i -I --before-build php-symfony2-process-2.3.1
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean --buildsystem=phppear --with phppear
   dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=phppear
   dh_clean -O--buildsystem=phppear
 dpkg-source -i -I -b php-symfony2-process-2.3.1
dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: building php-symfony2-process using existing ./php-symfony2-process_2.3.1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file Process-2.3.1/package.xml
dpkg-source: info: building php-symfony2-process in php-symfony2-process_2.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: building php-symfony2-process in php-symfony2-process_2.3.1-1.dsc
 debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem=phppear --with phppear
   dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=phppear
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/e402b82b49d23e6d2c7ff5f4ede872ab400fee6d/debian.org/packages/pkg-php/php-symfony2-process/build-area/php-symfony2-process-2.3.1'
dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=phppear
# Remove references of .gitignore
sed -i 's@^.*\.gitignore.*$@@' */package.xml
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/e402b82b49d23e6d2c7ff5f4ede872ab400fee6d/debian.org/packages/pkg-php/php-symfony2-process/build-area/php-symfony2-process-2.3.1'
   dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=phppear
 fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=phppear --with phppear
   dh_testroot -O--buildsystem=phppear
   dh_prep -O--buildsystem=phppear
   dh_auto_install -O--buildsystem=phppear
dh_auto_install: only one binary package supported, got 2
make: *** [binary] Error 255
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1357:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I failed
gbp:error: Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I': debuild -i -I returned 29
-----

i guess i'd have to override dh_auto_install, but i'm not sure how best
to go about it (i see for example that php-sabredav defines two binary
packages in debian/control, but they use composer as build system:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-owncloud/php-sabredav.git;a=blob;f=debian/control;h=69a06c286f9d0d11b57268fc956b041e64c7d16e;hb=HEAD)

other than this, feedback on this package is welcome.

best
andrea

-- 
andrea rota

Xelera - IT infrastructures
http://xelera.eu/contact-us/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: