[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#635474: Bug#635476: duplicated library code



On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> On 21-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> >Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> >> Can't we get coverage 3.6 into Debian, with enabled Python 3 support now?
>> >
>> >If you can see a way to do it without adding those libraries in the
>> >package, sure. I think it would not be worthwhile to bundle them with
>> >‘python-coverage’.
>>
>> I don't personally use any of the html stuff in coverage, so for me, if it's
>> just a degradation in the html output, I won't care.  Others might, but I'll
>> let them fix the JavaScript packaging issues.
>
> That's not a solution for Debian, then. The Debian package will need to
> wait for a way that works for Debian; and for now, I see the most likely
> option is to get those who want this in Debian to motivate someone skilled
> to package the third-party libraries needed.

I've taken a quick look at those two RFPs.

libjs-jquery-hotkeys:

- code.google.com page says that the development has been moved to
https://github.com/jeresig/jquery.hotkeys
- that github repo is a fork of
https://github.com/tzuryby/jquery.hotkeys, forked about 4 years ago
and not in sync
- looks like compatible with jquery 1.7, but I didn't test it with 2.0
(which is not in Debian yet)

libjs-jquery-isonscreen:

- only has an entry on old jquery plugins website, not on the new
plugins.jquery.com
- doesn't seem to be compatible with jquery 1.7

I can try to package the first one (hotkeys), but probably I won't
have time for it until next week.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


Reply to: