[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#705954: ITP: ms-sys -- writes Microsoft compatible boot records



ms-sys-free works fine with Windows 7. I actually specifically tested it with the official Windows 7 trial iso which was available from Microsoft until January. I used ms-sys-free in order to make a Windows 7 installation USB stick from the iso, rather than having to burn a DVD (since I do not have a DVD burner or any blank DVDs).

 

I used the following steps to accomplish this:

format USB drive to master boot record scheme

create partition of type NTFS

add bootable partition flag

mount “/path/filename.iso” /mnt -t udf -o loop

copy over all files (from /mnt to USB partition)

install ms-sys-free

ms-sys -s /dev/sdX (replacing “sdX” with the actual device name)

 

This (last step) puts a public domain syslinux master boot record onto the device which allows booting to the Windows 7 installation process. This is done seamlessly. I couldn't tell any difference between using the copyrighted Microsoft master boot record and using the public domain syslinux master boot record. Without this step, the USB stick will not boot into the Windows 7 installation process.

 

Presumably, this will work for whatever other use cases exist for this application as well.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Eriberto

Sent: 05/16/13 10:53 AM

To: Judith Thomason

Subject: Re: Bug#705954: ITP: ms-sys -- writes Microsoft compatible boot records

 
Hi Judith! 

Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I really can consider it. 

However, the code haven't support to Windows 7. What is the advantages 
using this program? 

Thanks a lot in advance!!!! 

Regards, 

Eriberto 


2013/5/15 Judith Thomason <JudithDThomason@mail.com>: 
> I suggest ms-sys-free ... 
> 
> "This is a fork of the ms-sys project by Henrik Carlqvist, removing 
> proprietary boot code from the program, leaving only free ones. There is no 
> need to use this version unless you are concerned about the copyright status 
> of the embedded boot code."

Reply to: