Dear Sune, I removed a few spurious phrases from the end of the description: you are right, those assuptions were wrong, I shall let them to their author. Indeed, I think that qupzilla is worth a package. Best regards, Georges. Sune Vuorela a écrit : > On Tuesday 23 April 2013 00:18:37 Georges Khaznadar wrote: > > Description : lightweight web browser based on libqtwebkit > > Please define lightweight. > > Two good links to descriptions of the term lightweight. > > http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2013/04/what-makes-a-lightweight-desktop-environment-lightweight/ > http://mjg59.livejournal.com/136274.html > > > > There are already a lot of QtWebKit > > browsers available, but they are either bound to the KDE environment > > (rekonq), > > This is just plain wrong. *nothing* binds for example rekonq to a kde > environment. Please stop spreading such clueless wrong statements. > > > are not actively developed or very unstable and miss > > important features. > > This is also wrong. THere is both rekonq and konqueror around. > > > But there is missing a multiplatform, modern and > > actively developed browser. > > There is both rekonq and konqueror around. > > So, I hope you will polish up the descriptions to get the facts straight > before uploading the package. > > /Sune > -- > Man, how can I save on the head from Office 2.3.2? > > >From LinuxPPC 97 and from the tools within Flash you have to boot from a > hardware over a 65-bit menu on a driver over the FPU on the case to a ROM > attachment to get access on the display. > -- Georges KHAZNADAR et Jocelyne FOURNIER 22 rue des mouettes, 59240 Dunkerque France. Téléphone +33 (0)3 28 29 17 70
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature