[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#703762: ITP: jdownloader -- download manager for one-click hosting sites



Hi Michael,

Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> writes:
> > I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged and
> > the upstream build system needs to be bent to build on Debian. I would
> > love to ditch the launcher and replace it with a proper package. This is
> > a lot of work. Until this work is done, I like to have this launcher in
> > the contrib archive. This is suboptimal, but better than nothing.
> I suspected that, but I really don’t want to get into Java packaging,
> especially not in such a hairy case.

That's comprehensible.

> > I think the description is clear enough (otherwise improvements are
> > welcome). The package is installer, launcher, and provides desktop
> > integration. If you have a strong opinion to rename the package, can you
> > provide name suggestions?
> I’d suggest jdownloader-installer, but I don’t have a strong opinion for
> renaming the package in the first place — I just think it would be a
> good idea in order to keep the name jdownloader for “proper” packages
> later and make it clear to users what they are getting when they are
> installing jdownloader.

A name conflict is no problem. This package will just be replaced by the
“proper” packages later.

Alternative package would be jdownloader-downloader,
jdownloader-launcher. There are a bunch of packages in contribute with
"-installer" in its name. A package that do not follow this rules is
flashplugin-nonfree. I haven't made up my mind what name to choose.

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer


Reply to: