Bug#693859: benchmark details and releases
> - - This one seems about 25% faster compressing in some simple tests I
> ran (compressing a 2.7G file with 6 threads, maximum compression).
> Decompression seems to be a wash between xz, pxz, and pixz on files
> produced by xz. On files produced by pixz, pixz is noticably faster
It should be noted that the final sizes are as follows
331M xz -9
352M pxz -9
399M pixz -9
So, as usual, I guess there is no free lunch.
Of course, compared to gzip -9 at 853M, they're all good options.
Also, upstream very kindly released 1.0 today, so that will probably be
the initial version I package.
d
Reply to: