[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#678865: Bug#540701: Questions and patches: new official Debian package for wbar



Hello

That's all for now
Check the new release 2.3.2

Regards


2012/9/8 Markus Koschany <apo@gambaru.de>:
> On 07.09.2012 05:01, Rodolfo Granata wrote:
>> Hey Markus,
>>
>> * Added wbar.png back
>> * Updated make-conf.sh to take multiple search directories
>> * I wanna keep the font even though it may not exist, if I'm not
>> mistaken, wbar will start anyway and it will get a default if it does.
>> * Added your latest patches.
>> * removed the debian dir.
>>
>> TODO: promote wbar-config.
>>
>
> Hi Rodolfo,
>
>
> thank you! I think i'm really done now. We need a new release. :)
>
> I've updated the README and added some paragraphs about wbar-config and
> make-conf.sh and removed some old lines and cleaned up a little. Patch
> is attached, let me know what you think about it.
>
> Forget about my suggestion to reintroduce the old icons. Although i know
> about the original authors now, it is much easier if i handle a default
> configuration by myself within the Debian system. It also makes the
> source package of wbar smaller and easier to maintain if you don't have
> to bother with external ressources.
>
> I've checked the fonts again and indeed, it seems wbar will start anyway
> even without a correct font path. Done!
>
> I've discovered another typo in wbar-config (licence -> license) and the
> version of wbar-config should be updated to 2.3.2 for your next release)
>
> And it was necessary to patch Makefile.am in the pixmaps folder to copy
> wbar.png to the right place again. Patch is attached.
>
> Last but not least: The COPYING file states that Wbar is licensed under
> the GPL-2+ (the + is important) which means you grant everyone the right
> to redistribute and modify wbar either under the GPL-2 or any later
> version. I personally think that's a good idea, but i wanted to ask
> again if that's your intention. If yes, great, no changes are needed but
> i guess you should change the license on the official homepage, too.
>
> That's all for now
>
> Regards
> Markus
>
>



-- 
Ing. Yadickson Soto
Linux User #497718


Reply to: