[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#519175: RFH: proftpd-dfsg -- versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon



Hi,

I was sifting through wnpp bugs and saw this one.

Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

> Note that it is now active a pkg-proftpd alioth project
> with a git repository under
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-proftpd/proftpd-dfsg.git;a=summary
>
> Other add-on module packages can be added under pkg-proftpd
> area easily, just ask to join the pkg-grass group.

Indeed.  Since it is not documented at <http://wiki.debian.org/Teams>,
maybe it is not easily discoverable.

Would you mind if I add a subpage there?  It would contain information
answering basic questions about how to work with the team that are not
likely to change often (to avoid growing stale).  Template taken from
<http://wiki.debian.org/TeamTemplate>.  Something like

 Infrastructure
 --------------
 Packages: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-proftpd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Alioth project: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-proftpd/

 Interacting with the team
 -------------------------
 Email contact: pkg-proftpd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

 Usual roles
 -----------
 Anyone on the team can commit good changes to the repositories
 and ask on the list for review and upload.

 Task description
 ----------------
 Proftpd has more than 20 different non-core modules available and
 some of them are important to users.
 See http://castaglia.org/proftpd/#Modules for a list.

 The pkg-proftpd team aims to package all important modules and to
 keep proftpd-dfsg and its modules maintained well in Debian.

 Get involved
 ------------
 All packages under the pkg-proftpd umbrella have Vcs-Git and
 Vcs-Browser fields declaring the git repositories where they are
 developed.

 New add-on module packages can be added easily. Just ask on Alioth to
 join the pkg-proftpd group.

Then the information about how to help would be easy to find and this
report would not be needed any more.

Sensible?
Jonathan



Reply to: