[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#648682: marked as done (ITP: gvl -- A collection of versatile support libraries for C++)

Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:52:28 +0200
with message-id <1339098748.5803.11.camel@mas>
and subject line Re: unmerging ITPs for gvl and lierolibre
has caused the Debian Bug report #648682,
regarding ITP: gvl -- A collection of versatile support libraries for C++
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648682
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2011-11-14
Severity: wishlist

* Package name : gvl
Version : 0~hg20100123.1
Upstream Author : Erik Lindroos "gliptic"
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gvl
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Description :
A collection of versatile support libraries for C++, consisting of
generic containers, I/O stream framework, random number generators,
cryptography, socket abstraction, OS abstraction and a reproducible
numerical library.

This is a build-dependency of Liero, whose ITP is at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648681

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 19:44 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:22:55PM +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 18:56 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > (...)
> > > I'm unmerging the ITPs for gvl and lierolibre because these seem different
> > > softwares.  Let me know if I'm wrong about this.  In case you meant that there
> > > won't be any need to package "gvl" anymore, then please close it's ITP.
> > 
> > I created a fork/branch of gvl[0] (due to inactive upstream) and is
> > currently packaging this as an integral part of lierolibre (gvl was
> > pretty much always meant as being tied to liero, and _very_ unfit to be
> > a shared lib).
> > 
> > Hence I figured it made logical sense to merge the ITPs, since that's
> > what's happening in practice with the code... You think it's better to
> > close the ITP in this case?
> > 
> > [0] https://gitorious.org/lierolibre/gvl
> 
> If you no longer intend to package gvl separately, then it is best to close
> 648682 now.

Will do.

-- 
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: