[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#648674: Sponsoring



Hello Thomas,

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Thomas Müller wrote:
> I will most likly stripp off the app 'media' which is the media player.
> This thing needs the jplayer.swf.

Well, people can install apps manually anyway, and it up to them what.
As long as we do not package and redistribute problematic stuff.

> As you already started with the update to 3.0.2 can I assume you are
> also interested in co-maintaining?

Well, I cannot fully commit yet, but it's looking good.  I am looking to
do it within the scope of my job otherwise I cannot promise having time
for it yet.  This means that it should be good enough for our project to
use.

> I'd love to have a more experianced DD on my side - an least to have a
> backup in stressfull times.

Yes, I can imagine that.  The same holds for me.

> We need a svn or git repo - can I ask you for support on this?

Yeah, we need a git repo.  I already feel "dirty" meddling with package
stuff just in some directory on my harddisk... unversioned.

I suggest I set one up, you import your original 2.0.3 work, and I
update it with the 3.0.2 work.  As a result, you can see what I have
fixed and what still needs to be done.  For 4.x we need to do this
again, but we might upload 3.0.2 to experimental soon.

> OC 4 will arrive on 22.5.2012 - maybe the candidate for Debian Wheezy?

I think so.  I ope we can convince them beforehand to clean the source
up a bit.  All these messy excutable bits and what not.

> Concerning your comments from your last email:
> - watch file: There was none due to missing upstream info on the web site. 
> I did address this to the project head and now the info is there -
> let's see if it's watch file compliant.

I was looking for that info, couldn't find it, so I let the watch-file
be in my packages.

> - "unapplied-patches": I still need to read the link.

Already set that locally.

> - 3rd party stuff:  I had a look and I didn't find sabre.  Concerning
> MDB2:  there is a sub-package missing - I think schema.  We need to
> reavaluate.

Ok, but I think we should either strip 3rd-party and make sure
everything is in Debian separately.  Or... if they made modifications to
stuff in 3rd-party (which is not cool), we need to think of a better solution.

I can resume work on this possibly next Sunday or Tuesday.

Paul

-- 
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux  | E-mail: paulvt@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: paul@luon.net          | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181



Reply to: