Bug#668126: marked as done (ITP: python-odict -- Ordered dictionary in Python)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:45:50 +0900
with message-id <87wr5pxedd.wl%takaki@asis.media-as.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#668126: ITP: python-odict -- Ordered dictionary in Python
has caused the Debian Bug report #668126,
regarding ITP: python-odict -- Ordered dictionary in Python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
668126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668126
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Owner: takaki@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : python-odict
Version : 1.4.4
Upstream Author : BlueDynamics Alliance
* URL or Web page : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/odict
* License : BSD-3
Description : Ordered dictionary in Python
Dictionary in which the insertion order of items is preserved (using
an internal double linked list). In this implementation replacing an
existing item keeps it at its original position.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>>>>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:09:44 +0200
>>>>> jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com(Julian Taylor) said:
> On 04/09/2012 01:37 PM, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:30:49 +0200
> >>>>>> jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com(Julian Taylor) said:
> >
> >> what is the advantage of this over the ordered dictionary which is
> >> builtin wheezy's default python?
> >> http://docs.python.org/library/collections.html#collections.OrderedDict
> >
> > I don't know. Slimit (#662756) requires this library. That's a reason
> > to make the package.
>
> slimit only needs it when OrderedDict is not available.
> (src/slimit/scope.py:30)
> Unless you need to support python 2.6 (which will disappear from debian
> at some point) I would recommend to just patch out the dependency
> instead of adding an obsolete package.
All right, I'll allow your advise and close this bug.
--
谷口 貴紀 (TANIGUCHI Takaki) takaki@asis.media-as.org
http://takaki-web.media-as.org/ takaki@debian.org
http://facebook.com/taniguchi.takaki http://twitter.com/takaki_t
--- End Message ---
Reply to: