[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#654924: Inclusion of TigerVNC sources



Good point. vnc.so makes this harder.

/ Ola

Sent from my phone



-----Original Message-----
From: Joachim Falk <joachim.falk@gmx.de>
To: Ola Lundqvist <ola@inguza.com>
Cc: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>, 654924@bugs.debian.org, Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Sent: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:56
Subject: Re: Bug#654924: Inclusion of TigerVNC sources

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Mike, Ola,

Am 07.04.2012 22:37, schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
>> Hi Joachim,
>>
>> On Sa 07 Apr 2012 22 <tel:201222>:10:26 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
[SNIP]
>>> The git subproject is hardcoded to this version. Of course if
>>> you built for wheezy the subproject should be changed to pick up
>>> the xorg version of wheezy. Furthermore, the symlink xserver.patch
>>> has to be adjusted accordingly.
>>
>> As we prepare packages for Debian wheezy and have to move the package
>> into unstable first, we have to use Xorg from unstable.
>
> You do not necessarily need to use the same, even though it is a good
> starting point. As you can see from vnc4 I still use xfree, not even
> xorg...
Well, you also have disabled vnc.so. If you don't use the current X11
server of the distribution, then a working vnc.so is not guaranteed.
Well, we also could investigate to build vnc.so and only vnc.so against
the installed xserver-xorg-dev.

Regards,
Joachim

P.S.: I created a squeeze-backports branch

- --
Joachim Falk <Joachim.Falk@gmx.de>

You can always tell a really good idea by the enemies it makes.
  --programmers' axiom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=kPBY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: