Bug#471927: [Scratch] Scratch 1.4 source code released under GPL v2
2012/4/4 Michael Hanke <mih@debian.org>:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> 2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill <mako@debian.org>:
>> > I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
>> > make it clear that re-packaging is fine while using the marks (it
>> > says as much) so I don't forsee that this will be a problem getting
>> > things into Debian.
>>
>> Yup, I agree with your POV here. I don't expect big problems from
>> ftpmasters, I hope we're right :)
>
> A more fundamental issue could be a potential show stopper. Take a look
> at the etoys package -- technically similar, FOSS license, but still in
> non-free. Below a full quote from the source package's README.nonfree:
As long as the image itself is the source the preferred format for
modification) and is included in the package with a free license, my
opinion is that DFSG's are fulfilled. If ftpmasters don't see it that
way, we'll have to push the conflict upwards. I don't plan on
uploading it to non-free, as it is indeed a free package.
Lets wait and see, though, and move from there when/if it happens. For
the moment I'm more concerned about making it work with latest
squeak-vm :)
Greetings and thanks,
Miry
Reply to: