Bug#654924: Alioth Projekt genehmigt
- To: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>
- Cc: 654924@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#654924: Alioth Projekt genehmigt
- From: Joachim Falk <joachim.falk@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:04:24 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4F7B81F8.1050307@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: Joachim Falk <joachim.falk@gmx.de>, 654924@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <4F53D909.90001@gmx.de>
- References: <4F44119D.1020902@gmx.de> <20120221230027.20376gml8osinw1n@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <4F4415C3.4030509@gmx.de> <20120223084016.44636489j44z6teo@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <4F461951.8070404@gmx.de> <20120223130455.776031s5c323cqcn@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <4F468CC6.4050008@gmx.de> <4F4C041B.8090200@gmx.de> <20120229150151.100629e09e3pgqmn@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <4F53715A.2020903@gmx.de> <20120304194412.118899qw9gegavwc@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <4F53D909.90001@gmx.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mike,
we are in business. Alioth has now a project for tigervnc.
I also added you as an admin. I myself have a version of
tigervnc 1.1.90 which builds and generates debs for
tigervnc-common_1.1.90-1jf_amd64.deb
tigervnc-scraping-server_1.1.90-1jf_amd64.deb
tigervnc-standalone-server_1.1.90-1jf_amd64.deb
tigervnc-viewer_1.1.90-1jf_amd64.deb
tigervnc-xorg-extension_1.1.90-1jf_amd64.deb
Testing remains to be done. Also some small features
from my old tigervnc 1.1.0 package are still not
merged.
Regards,
Joachim
- --
Joachim Falk <Joachim.Falk@gmx.de>
You can always tell a really good idea by the enemies it makes.
--programmers' axiom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=uwi/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: