Bug#628997: gecko-mediaplayer maintenance
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:52, Sebastian Ramacher <s.ramacher@gmx.at> wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 05:11 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Ok, thank you to let me know. Is the package ready on your side? If
>> yes, I'll upload it.
>
> Is debian/copyright okay? Or should we document the licenses from the build
> system (as in gecko-mediaplayer) there too?
>
> Otherwise it's ready from my side.
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>
IMHO for the most commonly used build systems, like autotools and cmake, the
license of those files can be omitted in d/copyright.
As you had mentioned, I did a quick check for gecko-mediaplayer's copyright and
found two problems:
1.INSTALL is not licensed under GFDL, also GFDL isn't DFSG Free.
2.For files that have multiple licenses, for example MPL-1.1, GPL-2+
and LGPL-2.1+,
we need to add the "license block" in d/copyright, also including the
actual text of
those three licenses.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
Reply to: