Bug#658863: who "owns" the ITP?

[Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>]

Le Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:52:55 -0500,
Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> a écrit :

Hello,

> I got interested in veewee due to Christopher's post in
> debian-cloud@d.m.l ... besides "official" Vagrant images it sounds
> like a viable replacement for our ad-hoc scripts to generate
> neuro.debian.net .ova's for VirtualBox .
> 
> I just sent to BTS removal of blockage by 659031 since that is no
> longer the case as far as I see it.
> 
> I wonder now though -- who, Laurent or Christopher or both, are
> actually ITP it? ;-)
> 
> myself, I am a Python guy and really uneducated in Ruby so would be
> nearly useless to help here unfortunately :-/  But I might learn it a
> bit while trying to use the beast. Cheers

AFAIK there are still some (5?) direct reverse-dependencies that must
first be packaged, I'm not sure I'll have the time soon to look at this.

Maybe a first step would be to open ITP/RFP for all the missing direct
and indirect reverse dependencies for veewee.

I've no objection if someone what to takeover this ITP.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville

PS: I'm not a ruby expert either. But packaging ruby gems is not that
difficult with the help of gem2deb tools :)