Bug#602499: Progress?

To: Christian Welzel <gawain@camlann.de>
Cc: 602499@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#602499: Progress?
From: Joey Parrish <joey.parrish@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:45:01 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] CAD0GTaX6zCMsRcwkuVWdgHMQSVoZvQRK9oxC0400KM9Q8V30iA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Joey Parrish <joey.parrish@gmail.com>, 602499@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5086BB3B.7000303@camlann.de>
References: <[🔎] 5086554E.5030403@camlann.de> <[🔎] CAD0GTaVFqoNM-u8eo8cJ+Y-sSKjfw8mbFf5wkkNZzdYWWvn50A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 5086BB3B.7000303@camlann.de>

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Christian Welzel <gawain@camlann.de> wrote:

Can your work be found somewhere?

Here's where I left off:

http://ghostfirth.com/flex-sdk.tar.gz

There are multiple versions for different Flex SDK releases. They built from Adobe's binary distributions since Adobe's sources wouldn't build on Linux. That made the package in this state only suitable for inclusion in non-free, IIRC.

MfG,
--Joey

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#602499: Progress?
  - From: Christian Welzel <gawain@camlann.de>
- Bug#602499: Progress?
  - From: Joey Parrish <joey.parrish@gmail.com>
- Bug#602499: Progress?
  - From: Christian Welzel <gawain@camlann.de>

Prev by Date: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Next by Date: Bug#646377:
Previous by thread: Bug#602499: Progress?
Next by thread: Bug#691229: O: coherence -- Python UPnP framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread