Hi Paul, Unfortunately there's no licensing information in the tarball [0]. You said it's GPLv2 in the RFP, which is a good choice, but would be nice at least a comment in the source code reflecting this, see how to here [1]. regards, [0] http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/xseticon/xseticon-0.1+bzr12.tar.gz [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html#SEC4 -- Ricardo Mones ~ Datei nicht gefunden Fehler 404
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature