Bug#668334: RFA: digitemp -- read temperature sensors in a 1-Wire net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
reassign 668334 wnpp
retitle 668334 RFA: digitemp -- read temperature sensors in a 1-Wire net
submitter 668334 unriccio@email.it
owner 668334 !
kthxbye
On 04/14/2012 11:24 AM, Riccardo Stagni wrote:
> I'm neither a DM/DD so I had to have my uploads sponsored. I could
> ask to my usual sponsor (Enrico Zini), but I think it's better if
> you ask to the DD with whom you worked most.
Ahh, I didn't realize that. I saw you have a few other packages, and
assumed you were a DD. You may want to look at the DM program; the
barrier to entry is lower (especially if you're already working with
sponsors) and gives you the ability to update your own packages once
the initial package sponsorship is done.
I've gone ahead and moved this into wnpp as an RFA. I'm in the middle
of migrating PGP keys and my new key is not yet in the
debian-maintainers keyring, but once that settles down I'll get a
sponsor to switch the maintainer to me. Thank you!
> (btw, thanks for maintaining grepcidr!) :)
Wow, I didn't think anyone else used grepcidr. No problem.
RF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=GTrr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: