[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#583476: openscad ITP



On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:30:33PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
> CGAL is in main now, does that mean your package can be also?

it can be. by the time i last updated the package, cgal wasn't updated
yet. i'll prepere a new debian version going to the proper repository.

> tests 168-379 fail - is that something to be concerned about?

no.

the tests are mixed -- some check the functionality of the openscad
language interpretation, serving as regression tests for the basic
functionality of openscad itself.

others target the visual representation -- that's why some elaborate
image comparison is done. these tests require presence of an opengl
rendering engine. such could be provided in the build environment by
running a virtual x server. most imporantly, though, these tests are
there to test whether openscad works on a particular graphics card.

on the long term, i'd like to have the tests split on those that require
graphics output and those that are just basic tests of the openscad
language, as to run only the latter and require all of them to pass --
but for the moment, the current setup provides an easy way to see when
things went wrong if they go wrong, and otoh doesn't spend too much time
as the test requiring grahics fail quickly.

> The changelog has lots of entries in it that says it has been released
> to unstable and experimental already, but I can't find it in the
> repos. Is this a new package or reviving of an old one? If it is a new
> one that has never been in unstable, you should get rid of the
> changelog entries saying that it was. You also should close this ITP
> bug in the changelog.

the packages were previously uploaded only to my own private server
archive.amsuess.com's unstable and experimental areas and to an ubuntu
ppa, from where they are already used.

i remember a recent discussion on mentors@l.d.o, which concluded that
some sponsors would like all the old changelog entries marked as
UNRELEASED if that version didn't make it, and yet others like it
collapsed. if the latter is your preferred way, i'll collapse them to a
single short message.

> I can sponsor it [...]

thank you. i'll prepare an updated package (to section main, with
changelog collapsed, standards version updated, and possible new lintian
warnings fixed), and notify you when it's ready.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: