On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:25 +0200, Lennart Weller wrote: > > I already got a sponsor for the package and I already completed the > packaging a few month back but thanks for offering your help. How come you didn't file an ITP *before* packaging it? That is what ITPs are for. > The package is already in collab-maint [1]. And in the new queue for > unstable. It was mainly meant to allow to build 0ad. Here [2] is the > ITP for 0ad which requires nvidia-texture-tools to continue. I see. Here is a quick review of your packaging: Your library versioning is broken, you should use a Debian-specific SONAME until upstream sets that. Personally I don't think the libs should be public, better to put them in a private dir. 02-multiarch.patch looks like it *does* need forwarding. You might want to run wrap-and-sort -sa so that diffs of the debian/ dir are more readable. IMO libnvtt-bin should be called nvidia-texture-tools. The package version has +dfsg in it but there is no indication of how the upstream tarball was repacked and what was non-free. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part