[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#631139: marked as done (ITP: mosh -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:29:25 -0400
with message-id <CAO6P2QRdssQLPGYiL0Mw2bD5-o0B2W1vxf6AHWJV-8Uu+hG_iw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Mosh has been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #631139,
regarding ITP: mosh -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
631139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Banks <amoebae@gmail.com>

* Package name    : mosh
  Version         : 0.2.7
  Upstream Author : Taro Minowa <higepon@users.sourceforge.jp>
* URL             : http://mosh.monaos.org/
* License         : BSD-2-clause
  Programming Lang: C++, Scheme
  Description     : fast R6RS Scheme interpreter

Daniel Moerner attempted to package Mosh before under the ITP #537776, which is
now archived.  This attempt stalled, but I have picked up the project on
collab-maint (with Daniel's consent).  Currently Debian has two R6RS
implementations: Guile and Racket.  Mosh provides two R6RS environments based on
the same VM, one using the popular psyntax expander (that is also used by Guile)
and one using an expander by Andre van Tonder.  The primary difference from
Guile and Racket is that Mosh has a smaller and more R6RS-focused library
system, as it was designed for R6RS.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Howdy,

As one can see at[1], this package has been uploaded (actually,
three[2][3][4] times)

Closing out the ITP and RFS.

In the future, you should consider two things:

1) When Debianizing, start the changelog from scratch - the backlog of
Ubuntu (I'm guessing PPA uploads) aren't really helpful :)
2) Consider closing your ITP in the initial changelog. If you didn't
have the backlog of changelog entries, lintian would throw a warning
at you.

Thanks for helping make Debian better,
Paul

[1]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh.html
[2]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh/news/20120323T153313Z.html
[3]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh/news/20120313T195236Z.html
[4]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh/news/20120306T120314Z.html

-- 
I'm Paul.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: