[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608656: marked as done (RFP: rspec2 -- A Behaviour-Driven Development tool for Ruby)

Your message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:17:04 +0100
with message-id <20120314101704.GA31118@spin>
and subject line ruby-rspec* v2 packages are in Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #608656,
regarding RFP: rspec2 -- A Behaviour-Driven Development tool for Ruby
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Package name: rspec2
Version: 2.3
Upstream Author: Chad Humphries, David Chelimsky, The RSpec Development
Team
URL: http://relishapp.com/rspec
License: MIT
Description: Behaviour-Driven Development tool for Ruby
 BDD is an approach to software development that combines Test-Driven 
 Development, Domain Driven Design, and Acceptance Test-Driven Planning.
 RSpec helps you do the TDD part of that equation, focusing on the
 documentation and design aspects of TDD.

There already exists a package rspec, but there have been some major
changes in RSpec2, so it would make sense to provide this as a separate
package.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi!

Debian provides for some time now packages ruby-rspec*, corresponding to
the version 2 of rspec. These packages are maintained by the Ruby Extras
packaging team. I am therefore closing this bug.

Thanks!

Cédric

--- End Message ---
Reply to: