Bug#579401: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Please state pyopenfst copyright/license clearly!]]
I found different email addresses for both committers and forwarded my
message to those addresses. I'm forwarding David Huggins-Daines' reply
here:
-------- Forwarded message --------
> Hi! Thomas Breuel wrote the original code for the most part. I don't
> recall if I added the Apache copyright notices to my parts of the code
> and can't look at the moment. If not I certainly give permission to
> do so.
>
> 2012/2/24 Bernhard Reiter <ockham@raz.or.at>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > Von: Bernhard Reiter <ockham@raz.or.at>
> > An: Thomas Breuel <tmbdev@gmail.com>, David Huggins-Daines
> > <dhdfoo@gmail.com>
> > Kopie: 579401@bugs.debian.org
> > Betreff: Please state pyopenfst copyright/license clearly!
> > Datum: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:31:30 +0100
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > and thank you for your work on pyopenfst!
> >
> > Debian maintainers and contributors would really like to
> package
> > pyopenfst for Debian, but unfortunately, there doesn't seem
> enough
> > copyright and license information available to fulfil Debian
> > guidelines.
> >
> > pyopenfst's project homepage on Google Code states that the
> code is
> > licensed under the Apache License 2.0, and we've found your
> email
> > addresses in the list of committers, but please help us by
> stating
> > copyright and license information clearly by adding a note
> to the code.
> >
> > There's an appendix to the Apache License 2.0 on how to do
> it:
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply
> >
> > Also see
> http://code.google.com/p/pyopenfst/issues/detail?id=6
> > and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579401
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Bernhard Reiter
>
>
>
Reply to: