Bug#660496: O: 9wm -- emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of 9wm, Decklin Foster <decklin@red-bean.com>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package
now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: 9wm
Binary: 9wm
Version: 1.2-9
Maintainer: Decklin Foster <decklin@red-bean.com>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0), xutils-dev, x11proto-core-dev,
libx11-dev, libxext-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Format: 1.0
Files: 66735b67394db63d9f8649ca541ecbff 946 9wm_1.2-9.dsc
b7e9502f430550ac5fff7507fc9ae8b6 20766 9wm_1.2.orig.tar.gz
09d1e3aa127b4983079db1bd3c9065ef 3709 9wm_1.2-9.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha1: f1e7921d030ae5f2296f03f06da5ab71d475adb3 946 9wm_1.2-9.dsc
a0cfef64c1c79118fb0d45aab8e25f0b5583d2a2 20766 9wm_1.2.orig.tar.gz
4fe4d2f89c0e22189dfe3ca690f21d895acd33fd 3709 9wm_1.2-9.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
3ea3806142f0f438bc4cdecd3670dd8f7c392cadf81dd06985f1e95b4cc50c15 946
9wm_1.2-9.dsc
92799c25782c8850d28a3990643398f9b9485681030075e0c8f477812e45c23d
20766 9wm_1.2.orig.tar.gz
3c3787a8ce79786a43076e31f3e230c788d53a1fa4f16a6941ebcf102448a786 3709
9wm_1.2-9.diff.gz
Directory: pool/main/9/9wm
Priority: source
Section: x11
Package: 9wm
Version: 1.2-9
Installed-Size: 68
Maintainer: Decklin Foster <decklin@red-bean.com>
Architecture: i386
Provides: x-window-manager
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libx11-6, libxext6
Suggests: 9menu
Description: emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2
Description-md5: 41ad7a3fb8957b989a3bd02e7e167200
Tag: interface::x11, role::program, uitoolkit::xlib, x11::window-manager
Section: x11
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/9/9wm/9wm_1.2-9_i386.deb
Size: 24932
MD5sum: 3e44065cc8d95513f0e43bef0797f83e
SHA1: 58760feebecd37ec70e22f1a0d62219f45569c6c
SHA256: b3d9bb5cd3612c8c4de52b8d1465e29741e5a69ae99eaf245867a8071857a117
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
Reply to: