Bug#656665: We link to OpenSSL, but the source is LGPL in fact, so no problem

To: 656665@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#656665: We link to OpenSSL, but the source is LGPL in fact, so no problem
From: Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:45 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAGstE8BwjpseMuY3OsYdR=VrxYhmF3tcond5gyj8v26-FqUyjg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com>, 656665@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAGstE8DVWjkmsJp+xNGL7XnBJ89vnHbDJgZPzJgcoXrBVBdXPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAGstE8DVWjkmsJp+xNGL7XnBJ89vnHbDJgZPzJgcoXrBVBdXPw@mail.gmail.com>

Le 16 février 2012 16:22, Ludovic Rousseau
<ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com> a écrit :
> The software is GPL-3+ or LGPL?

It looks like the licence is LGPL-3+ but the debian/copyright file is
not correct.

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#656665: We link to OpenSSL, but the source is LGPL in fact, so no problem
  - From: Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#656665: We link to OpenSSL, but the source is LGPL in fact, so no problem
Next by Date: Bug#656957: Some remarks about gppcscconnectionplugin packaging
Previous by thread: Bug#656665: We link to OpenSSL, but the source is LGPL in fact, so no problem
Next by thread: Bug#656957: Some remarks about gppcscconnectionplugin packaging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread