[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#654761: RFA: sextractor - source extractor for astronomical images



Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian@liska.ath.cx

Thanks for writing, sorry for the delayed response, thanks for your
work, etc :)

I don't have upload privileges, and haven't persued that in several
years now.

You're welcome to adopot sextractor.  Did you see my message?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406981#13

On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I discovered that the debian package "sextractor" was not changed over
> the last few years and did not upgrade to the latest upstream version
> 2.8.6. Also, the debian files do not follow the current standards.
> 
> I would like to know if you are still willing to maintian this package?
> In that case could prepare you an updated debian/directory that works
> with the current sextractor version and is lintian clean.

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:05:57AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> are you still going to maintain sextractor? If yes, maybe you are
> interested in what I did to bring it to the latest sextractor release
> and debian policy? I have created a git repository at
> <http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/sextractor.git>
> from which you could pick the changes. The packages compiles and is
> lintian clean.
> 
> If you are not maintaining sextractor anymore, would you mind to orphan
> the package or fill an RFA bug report? In this case, I would adopt the
> package.



Reply to: