Bug#654761: RFA: sextractor - source extractor for astronomical images
Thanks for writing, sorry for the delayed response, thanks for your
work, etc :)
I don't have upload privileges, and haven't persued that in several
You're welcome to adopot sextractor. Did you see my message?
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I discovered that the debian package "sextractor" was not changed over
> the last few years and did not upgrade to the latest upstream version
> 2.8.6. Also, the debian files do not follow the current standards.
> I would like to know if you are still willing to maintian this package?
> In that case could prepare you an updated debian/directory that works
> with the current sextractor version and is lintian clean.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:05:57AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> are you still going to maintain sextractor? If yes, maybe you are
> interested in what I did to bring it to the latest sextractor release
> and debian policy? I have created a git repository at
> from which you could pick the changes. The packages compiles and is
> lintian clean.
> If you are not maintaining sextractor anymore, would you mind to orphan
> the package or fill an RFA bug report? In this case, I would adopt the