[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#624758: marked as done (ITA: notify-osd)

Your message dated Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:19:06 +0000
with message-id <E1QSzBS-0006w1-Dk@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#624758: fixed in notify-osd 0.9.30-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #624758,
regarding ITA: notify-osd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624758
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the notify-osd package, with one RC
bug and an outdated version.

I CCed the the pkg-ayatana team and the debian-derivatives
mailing list, as this is part of the Ubuntu user experience
and maybe someone interested in Deb-Ubu-collaboration wants
to maintain it.

I have no use for this package anymore since quite some time
already, and have no intent to maintain it anymore. I'm now
also running GNOME 3 which has its own notification way.

I maintain the packaging in 
   https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~juliank/notify-osd/debian

it is derived from the main branch of notify-osd and patches
are maintained via bzr itself, just like the Ubuntu package.

Also, fixing Bug #539050 in giver seems a good idea:
  giver should support notification daemon without 'actions' capability.

The package description is:
 The Desktop Notifications framework provides a standard way of doing
 passive pop-up notifications on the Linux desktop.  These are
 designed to notify the user of something without interrupting their
 work with a dialog box that they must close.  Passive popups can
 automatically disappear after a short period of time.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

Attachment: pgp7tLnCUMIng.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: notify-osd
Source-Version: 0.9.30-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
notify-osd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

notify-osd_0.9.30-1.diff.gz
  to main/n/notify-osd/notify-osd_0.9.30-1.diff.gz
notify-osd_0.9.30-1.dsc
  to main/n/notify-osd/notify-osd_0.9.30-1.dsc
notify-osd_0.9.30-1_amd64.deb
  to main/n/notify-osd/notify-osd_0.9.30-1_amd64.deb
notify-osd_0.9.30.orig.tar.gz
  to main/n/notify-osd/notify-osd_0.9.30.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 624758@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <a.starr.b@gmail.com> (supplier of updated notify-osd package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:24:31 -0400
Source: notify-osd
Binary: notify-osd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: The Ayatana Packagers <pkg-ayatana-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <a.starr.b@gmail.com>
Description: 
 notify-osd - daemon that displays passive pop-up notifications
Closes: 548247 555778 624758
Changes: 
 notify-osd (0.9.30-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Merge new upstream release from Ubuntu, remaining
     Debian changes:
    - debian/control:
     + Update Standards-Version, change Maintainer and VCS fields.
     + Do not recommend notify-osd-icons, not in Debian.
    - src/defaults.c: Use dynamic slot allocation (See: #550592)
    - debian/rules: Generate debian/changelog.upstream
   * Adopt package for the Ayatana Packagers team and point Vcs
     fields to the pkg-ayatana repo at bzr.debian.org (Closes: #624758).
   * The new release fixes the FTBFS with binutils-gold (Closes: #555778).
   * Do not redirect output of dpkg-divert in notify-osd.{preinst, postrm}
     (Closes: #548247).
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2, no changes needed.
   * debian/rules:
    - Revert change from CDBS to dh 7.
    - Call autoreconf.mk before debhelper.mk so that it is
      properly cleaned up after (See: #596099).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8d5555c65fed3b9c2d8c5a6f8892f5fa4e25a2d4 1475 notify-osd_0.9.30-1.dsc
 10f47457971d41e0f412672d86f19a0878136493 608796 notify-osd_0.9.30.orig.tar.gz
 8bcc910ed646a7d34b09eee6f8d9802e6155c41a 38517 notify-osd_0.9.30-1.diff.gz
 72a008a6b7e4f6ea87ce67d2f887eb05eb602f49 204850 notify-osd_0.9.30-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 91de5abaaec621f23d8a2bbd25042d64c599c809b9c74f00b562a86ad4be16c5 1475 notify-osd_0.9.30-1.dsc
 5dbe49d46b6d7be703cd1f015b78bdfe8346dd409d020aa8b10fe023e25eb078 608796 notify-osd_0.9.30.orig.tar.gz
 475081c49031239f59004ed37d17d90dbbf99909ba50505c4ff542f042796462 38517 notify-osd_0.9.30-1.diff.gz
 5716fb621c004a81d7ccda3b4230e5c6567b6c49efddb14ac2eb997197442179 204850 notify-osd_0.9.30-1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 00317d565f1e2b7ba9892418594ca88a 1475 x11 optional notify-osd_0.9.30-1.dsc
 aa52780eb7be9eab6d6bd3a6b055ac09 608796 x11 optional notify-osd_0.9.30.orig.tar.gz
 b2866d4977eae50acbbae1a012c08621 38517 x11 optional notify-osd_0.9.30-1.diff.gz
 ceab526165b5beaf887b9ea7a34bc010 204850 x11 optional notify-osd_0.9.30-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3qrKQACgkQJKAUGKwVtQxgaACcDMmQ4KFYD7UHhQAnjNHoldu8
DRQAoJvRXmYGY4BfO46XjXk8kTrIFW96
=DR40
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: