On 05/12/2011 09:38 PM, David Francos Cuartero wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:10:07PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> Are you aware that aircrack-ng is RC-buggy[0], not in testing, and >> (for the moment) undistributable? > My god, I saw that bug lots of time ago, but since I saw aircrack-ng > in sid and the ticket said it was GPL2+ Confirmed... even tough I > can't see any more movement nor the ticket being closed since april. There was some action on #588588 again today. Let's hope it leads to a resolution. Since your QA page indicates that you are just getting started with Debian development (great!) and you appear to have some closer contacts with aircrack-ng, have you thought about asking to co-maintain the aircrack-ng package? There are already two maintainers, but they don't appear to be very active, at least on aircrack-ng. One of them is a DD, so he might be available as a sponsor. >> Until this is fixed, there is little point in packaging an UI for it. > I agree. But as said, if aircrack-ng is being redistributed in > sid, what's happening there? [1] > [1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/aircrack-ng The package was removed only from testing (not sid) as to allow the Squeeze release to progress -- #588588 was RC and blocking it. Christian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature