[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612296: bacula and bacula-doc



Hi Jan!

Re-adding the people who showed interest in helping as Cc:, please keep
them since I am not the only one working on Bacula.

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:11:48 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:56:41AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I am now part of this project, the next thing I will ask for is two
>> mailing lists: read-only -commits and -devel, the latter to be used as
>> Maintainers: in debian/control.  And I will also ask for a Git
>> repository, which will be the succession of John's repository at
>> <http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jgoerzen/bacula>.

Well, everything was done:

  <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bacula-commits>
  <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bacula-devel>
  <http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=summary>

> So what's the status of this? I need bacula and want to help (just
> requested to join),

Just out of my curiosity, do you strictly need 5.0.3 (the current
upstream version) or could you work with 5.0.2 (the one currently in
Debian)?  I am simply asking because if 5.0.3 is *necessary* for most of
the users, maybe we should ask for it as a stable-proposed-update,
instead of simply relying on backports.d.o.

> I even -- since I started to look at bugs in the package first before
> looking here :-/ -- started to work on bacula, i.e.  I have a clone of
> john's git repo here and have a few commits on it. I changed a bit,
> upgraded to 5.0.3 and am now trying to bring it a bit up2date
> packaging-wise. You're interested or do we have overlapping efforts
> now?

For sure we are interested, the more people are looking at a package the
better it is, but there is an overlapping effort going on: José planned
to prepare an update version for this week-end, so I guess you should
contact him and check to not do any duplicate work anymore.

I have not done anything yet, given that José promptly replied me (in
private), so I decided to let him doing the work and jump in later.  I
have some complaints/improvements in my head, I will come back ;-)

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Attachment: pgpxzBbLrfQW2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: