Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?

To: Asheesh Laroia <asheesh@asheesh.org>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>, Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@debian.hu>, 506040@bugs.debian.org, noel@debian.org
Subject: Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?
From: Clint Byrum <clint@ubuntu.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:26:34 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 1297103194.3020.381.camel@clint-MacBookPro>
Reply-to: Clint Byrum <clint@ubuntu.com>, 506040@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012182207140.8677@rose.makesad.us>
References: <1290365977.9821.3.camel@clint-MacBookPro> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011211521510.17131@cobra.newdream.net> <1290436452.9821.5.camel@clint-MacBookPro> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011291120510.4337@cobra.newdream.net> <1291075213.14018.101.camel@julia.gcs.org.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011300922530.30759@cobra.newdream.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012182207140.8677@rose.makesad.us>

On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 22:08 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I have nothing to contribute to this, except:
> 
> Thanks to Sage and Clint for pinging us again!
> 

Here's another ping.

Seeing as squeeze is out, and the NEW queue is, as I understand it,
hundreds and hundreds of packages long right now, it would probably be
good to get CEPH into that NEW queue ASAP.

I'm a little unclear where any additional packaging changes reside, but
I've gone ahead and packaged 0.24.2 for Ubuntu, it is here:

https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/ubuntu/natty/ceph/upstream-0.24

Note a few changes for policy v3.9.1 including removing the .la files
from the -dev libs.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?
  - From: Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@debian.hu>

Prev by Date: Bug#612296: O: bacula
Next by Date: Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?
Previous by thread: Bug#612296: bacula and bacula-doc
Next by thread: Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread